England's worst performance in a World Cup Finals? Undoubtedly. Outplayed, outclassed and out of (South) Africa. At least the 1966 ghost of "did the ball cross the line?" has now been laid to rest. Whether it did or not, it certainly did in Bloemfontein, but on this occasion there was no Russian linesman. And as for Munich, well we can all stop talking about that too.
Something, completely and unutterably, has to change now within the FA. I don't know whether Fabio should stay or not, and to be honest I don't think it really matters. What has to change, however, are the players. A manager must choose his system and then pick the best players to play that system, like any club manager would. He should not be picking the "best" eleven English players and then hoping that they will make a team. If anything an international manager should have it easier, since money to buy the best players, does not come into it. And England have plenty of good players.
But FIFA must do something too now. Their decision to not use technology on goal lines was ridiculous when they made it several months ago. It now looks more ridiculous, now that it has had an affect in a World Cup. I very much doubt that it would have changed the outcome in this game, but it might have, and that is the point. If results of these matches are called into question because of this, then that must be a problem for the governing body. We will see.
For the first time in my life I have not been able to sit through a whole England game, and I have been there for other defeats. It was more their lack of interest that became a problem. But at least I have the cricket now...